WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Fedora Core 4 - development "Domain 0 allocation is too

Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Fedora Core 4 - development "Domain 0 allocation is too small for kernel image"
From: "Randy Macleod" <macleodr@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:02:25 -0500
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:13:36 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <25943162.541138684241715.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Nortel
References: <25943162.541138684241715.JavaMail.root@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.3) Gecko/20040913
Timo Virtaneva wrote:
Hi

The 2.6.13 build is broken and it won't work. It is described in Redhat 
bugzilla.

Eithet you use the 2.6.11 or download working version from 
http://people.redhat.com/riel/xen_for_fc4/


  Thanks for the tip. I too used the rpms listed above
and got Xen to boot the RH FC4 distro
(networking didn't work though...)

Performance was disappointing.

This statement is based on
interactive desktop behaviour: startup, firefox, etc..
It was easy to run glxgears as a quick test so see below.

I'm a bit concerned because alot of the interest in Xen is
due to the claims like:
<quote>
Linux's performance is consistently close to native Linux,
the worst case being OSDB-IR, which experiences an 8% slowdown.
</quote>
(http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/performance.html)

So do other people see similar performance?
Am I doing something wrong/silly?
Is it reasonable to expect better interactive performance
for dom0?

Performance seemed so bad that I didn't bother to configure and
start a domU... not a good first impression.

Thanks,
// Randy


$ /sbin/lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge:
  Intel Corporation 82865G/PE/P DRAM Controller/Host-Hub Interface (rev 02)

$ cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep name
model name      : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz

$ free
Mem:       2067580     226208    1841372          0      17004     101524

The dom0 instance had > 1 G ram....




native 2.6.14-1.1656_FC4

[neptune@pcard0gb ~]$ glxgears
5504 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1100.800 FPS
5498 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1099.600 FPS
5505 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1101.000 FPS


mv /lib/tls /lib/tls.disabled
reboot 2.6.14-1.1656_FC4
[neptune@pcard0gb ~]$ glxgears
5462 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1092.400 FPS
5461 frames in 5.0 seconds = 1092.200 FPS

[neptune@pcard0gb ~]$ uname -r
2.6.12-1.1454_FC4xen0
[neptune@pcard0gb ~]$ glxgears
1312 frames in 5.0 seconds = 262.400 FPS
1296 frames in 5.0 seconds = 259.200 FPS

That's alot slower...

--
// Randy MacLeod
macleodr@xxxxxxxxxx  |   Not Nortel's Opinions.
---------------------X-----------------------------
Nortel, Ottawa, ON  / \

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users