 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization? |
| From: | Czakó Krisztián <slapic@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:03:03 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:12:22 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Organization: | Pilátus-Comp Kft. |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Hello, What is the better solution now to run linux domUs under Xen3? Using a VT hardware, sould I install a xen-patched kernel as I would where no VT extension, or use an unmodified linux guest system? Is there any performance difference between a Pentium D 3 Ghz with vt (9xx) and without it (8xx)? Regards, Slapic _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: Ubuntu: "no more processes left in this runlevel", SLB Xen Dev |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Xen and iSCSI, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] Networking: Simple steps, Randolph Hill |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] VT or paravirtualization?, Mark Williamson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
