 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
[Xen-users] Minimal kernel for domU
| To: | xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-users] Minimal kernel for domU |
| From: | Rickard Borgmäster <doktorn@xxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:30:06 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2006 14:39:57 +0000 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) |
Hello,Our router simulation project is moving forward. Right now I'm thinking about how to get the smallest possible kernel for domU. I really need it to consume almost no memory at all... The only thing that will be used inside domU is quagga/zebra routing daemon and sometimes dhttp. Maybe I should go for a 2.4 kernel? Would it be possible to run a 2.4 kernel inside domU? I suppose a 2.6 won't at least use _less_ memory than a 2.4? Best regards Rickard Borgmäster _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-users] DRBD & XEN-3, haad |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Minimal kernel for domU, Jorge Davila |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-users] DRBD & XEN-3, haad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Minimal kernel for domU, Jorge Davila |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
