|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: Using the -xen kernel rather than -xen0/U was [Xen-users] Poorhard d
> > Sure, you'll domU kernel may need an initrd (depends on the
> > filesystem) and will need modules installed in the guest
> filesystem.
> > It won't be any larger than a -xenU kernel. The fact that it has
> > privileged and back-end modules built for it doesn't matter -- it
> > can't actually use any of them as Xen won't allow it.
>
> Oh, did this change? I was under the impression we could
> have a guest domain take control of a NIC, for example.
Only under Xen's control. Just be cause a guest has privileged
components built into it doesn't mean it its acutually allowed to use
them.
"PCI passthrough" as its become known is on its way back into Xen 3.0 --
it just didn't make the 3.0.0 cut off.
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|