WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] routed network (not only one vif needed?)

To: georg@xxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] routed network (not only one vif needed?)
From: "Dirk H. Schulz" <dirk.schulz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:00:56 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 18:58:31 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <160.114.55.5.1130243720.wm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <160.114.55.5.1130243720.wm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Macintosh/20050923)
Hi Georg,

georg@xxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:

Hi!

Now I tried to set up xen for routed network. I didn't understand why so
much vifs will be create, as much as domains I have.
My routed network consists of the domain0 (with public IP), and domainU-s as the subnetwork (192.168.0.x)
So I modified the vif-route script in order to have only one vif for all
domainsU-s (with ip 192.168.0.254).  But in this case only the domainU
works, for that I created the vif. So I need more VIF in order to have
networking also in all my DomainU-s? all of these Vifs should have the
same IP address.
Why should that make sense? I do not see what you are after with this.

Routed networking implies that every domU is a subnet of its own, so it has to have an address space (not only a single address) of its own. Dom0 has to have a routing table that connects the dom0 NIC with the the virtual subnets that the domUs are.

(My subdomains are in one private network (192.168.0.1))
Why don't you use bridging, then?

Dirk

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>