|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits
> > So, you are reasonably confident that when applied to a
> > 64GB/16-way machine it isn't going to fall over flat on it's face? :-)
>
> Reasonably so. But I wouldn't bet any more than the smaller
> denominations of change that I've currently got in my pocket on it...
> ;-)
I don't think *many* people are running on machines this big, but I think a
few have done so (even on bigger machines). In Cambridge, we have a 8 core
Opteron, I think - the Unisys guys run on much bigger CPU counts.
The x86_64 is certainly passing the daily tests reliably now, so it's more a
question of whether your specific machine tickles any unexpected cases. Of
course, the pre-release testing phase is a good point to scream about bugs
like this ;-)
Cheers,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Gordan Bobic
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Gordan Bobic
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Petersson, Mats
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Petersson, Mats
- Re: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits,
Mark Williamson <=
- RE: [Xen-users] SMP and Memory Limits, Kevin Babst
|
|
|
|
|