Re: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridg

That's excellent. I'll wait for Rik to pick this one up for a
testing .rpm, though, because I never *ever* managed to build a 
RedHat kernel with external patches :)

Em Thursday 15 September 2005 16:05, Ian Pratt escreveu:
> > That's great, except when you need *two* bridges, for two
> > independent subnets, and there is no, as far as I can see, peth1.
>
> You can have multiple vethX interfaces on recent builds -- see
> netback/loopback.c. I think the current default is a rather miserly 1 (and
> should be increased), but can be set on the command line.
>
> Ian

-- 
Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf  Dep. Engenharia Mecânica/UFPE
ramiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx        tel: +55 81 2126-8231e239          

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridge-utils?, Ian Pratt RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridge-utils?, Ian Pratt Re: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridge-utils?, Ramiro Brito Willmersdorf <=

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-users] xen save error, Cole, Ray

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-users] Help! Error: Error creating domain: (39, 'Directory not empty'), Anthony Liguori

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-users] veth0 is from netback and vifu.0 is fromthebridge-utils?, Ian Pratt

Next by Thread:

[Xen-users] xm list errors, master

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]