RE: [Xen-users] xen save error

["Cole, Ray" <Ray_Cole@xxxxxxx>]

Right, I don't think it is at all related to the xen save error.  I was just 
reporting a separate issue with live migration after the comment had been made 
that migration had gone through combat :-)

-- Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Steven Hand [mailto:Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 11:05 AM
To: Cole, Ray
Cc: Steven Hand; Ian Pratt; bryant.johan@xxxxxxxxx;
xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Steven.Hand@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] xen save error



>There is a thread in here called "Live migration problem" that has a =
>bunch of information.  What I was able to narrow it down, via printk's =
>in the kernel, is the kernel receives a message indicating it needs to =
>suspend and adds to the work queue.  However the kernel never executes =
>the work to suspend and xen gives up waiting for it to happen.  The last =
>thing I see is the kernel calls scheduled_work=20
>
>The xfrd.log indicated it was unable to suspend.  There was nothing more =
>really in those logs.  I'll try to find some time today to re-run the =
>tests again.  I recently put my 3 machines back to the base 2.0.7 (no =
>'testing') so I'll need to put two of them back to 2.0.7 testing.  FWIW, =
>this was using the 2.6.11.12 kernel for the user domain with everything =
>else being 2.0.7 testing.
>
>http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-users/2005-08/msg00626.html =
>will get you to the thread.

yes - though this doesn't seem to be the same error; in particular 
the "[ERR] XFRD> Error adding op field" is the bit I was referring to 
never having seen before...

cheers,

S.


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users