WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] dom0 bootup -- Device eth0 has differet mac address than

To: datto@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] dom0 bootup -- Device eth0 has differet mac address than expecte
From: Danny Hembree <danny-hembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 20:13:37 -0700
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:11:44 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <48vheq$17carhk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: DynamicaLink
References: <48vheq$17carhk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: danny-hembree@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 19:00, datto@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >> I think he's having problems with Dom0 changing 
> >> Mac address, rather than the domU (is that right?)
> 
> Yes, you are correct. It's dom0 that seems to be getting a random MAC and 
> because of that Xen can't t find the NIC and won't load eth0 because the MAC 
> is different than what is expected. I've seen others with the same problem 
> and their (different) fixes haven't worked for me.
> 
> >> Does the original machine have more than one 
> >> ethernet device?  Perhaps Linux is enumerating the 
> >> cards in a different order when running under Xen so
> >> you're not using the card you think you are?
> 
> It's a single NIC in the machine. Dell 2400. NIC on the motherboard.
> 
> Ah well, I've decided to forego CentOS 4.1 for now and reload the box with 
> Fedora Core 4 since the Xen directions seem to be a bit better for Xen on FC4 
> than for Xen on CentOS 4.1/RHEL 4x. Hopefully that will make the world a 
> beautiful thing and allow me to actually see Xen working.

Following the instructions for FC4 doesn't help me. I'm trying to load
the same machine as you using the instructions from
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedoraXenQuickstart. If I do that It
loads  Xen 2.6. That is apparently the wrong one, it needs xen-3.0. If I
get that and the kernels that go with it, it won't boot at all. I
suppose there are dependency issues.

I'm trying to track them down but I feel lost and forlorn because I
suspect that something this monstrous would have shown up in the wiki or
the mailing list. I'm afraid it's some Dell thing. I also don't
understand the statement that FC4 has xen built in. I don't see it
anywhere and it looks like you have to get everything from FC5 to get it
up. Why won't xen2.0 work on FC4? Should I just go top FC3?


_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users