 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Re: unstable network problem
| To: | John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: unstable network problem |
| From: | Tim Durack <tdurack@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2005 13:02:55 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 17 Aug 2005 17:01:07 +0000 |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=D/Irj6JQJ6Tn9JL/PeJehVkhS2hKgtNv5lfMdfCN7h4gtiVgfxSy0rV2phAvah8Tt2VJafby/ix3tVJui1x6PusrdbGbrLIp2mrVJZTn2Fw1PjfrFDGWvVVhI+KAUIpHSuvvFpKJTNDaPweYi853Ryzic3eESeNgMQmNeEeEDqY= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <57373.10.0.14.156.1124293918.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <9e246b4d0508080634485e236c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <9e246b4d050817075448649277@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <57373.10.0.14.156.1124293918.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
If I configure Dom0 vif1.0 <-> guest eth0, I can ping between the two, but not ssh. Packet capture shows ethereal complaining about tcp checksum problems. Tried all kinds of enabling/disabling offload settings. Creating a gre tunnel between the two domains works, presumably because whatever the checksum offload problem is, it gets avoided by adding another header. Configuring Dom0 veth0/vif0.0/vif1.0/br0 <-> guest eth0 bridging works as expected. Tim:> On 8/17/05, John Madden <jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Okay, fixed it by using a bridged setup. > > Sorry, fixed what by using a bridged setup? The intermittent packet loss? > > John > > > > > -- > John Madden > UNIX Systems Engineer > Ivy Tech Community College of Indiana > jmadden@xxxxxxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: unstable network problem, John Madden |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-users] DomU Bridged vs. Routed Networking?, Andy Lee |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] Re: unstable network problem, John Madden |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-users] unstable network problem, Tim Durack |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
