| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] Serious performance problems - is Xen not ready for prod
> I hope my current problems with Xen 2.0.5 are related to my own
> stupidity - otherwise I'm getting the impression that Xen is not ready
> for productional use at the current stage.
It's a project that's still evolving rapidly - particularly in terms of the
installation and management toolkit - however lots of people are using it in
production settings already. The community sites at xensource.com run in Xen
domains, so we do eat our own dogfood :-)
Performance is one of Xen's key focus points. Rest assured that the problems
you're seeing are not normal - hopefully we can get you up and running.
> Everything seems to work - all services are there and working so the
> system itself is working ok. But: when accessing resources like squirrel
> webmail or accessing the IMAP service the machine is very slow (compared
> to old setup). The load average climbs easily to values above 6, 12 was
> the highest value that I got when playing with a single client. Old
> system was never used in a way that a lot CPU power was needed, load avg
> stays there normally below 0.05-0.1 -- on the Xen setup the load never
> dropped below 2.5 (!!).
First check: Can you verify that IDE DMA is working on your system? If not,
you'll probably need to build a new kernel with the appropriate drivers.
If that doesn't help:
* what sort of workload are you imposing in your tests?
* do you know where the CPU time is going in the domain?
* does the output of top and vmstat look weird?
* anything strange in the dmesg output (try comparing to the dmesg from a
native boot)?
> Together with the still unsolved question about ballooning the memory
> this caused my impression that I shouldn't use Xen in production
> environment (see also my message from 06/28/2005 03:47 'Can't increase
> memory size during runtime' or 'problem to balloon memory beyond initial
> allocation' from Xuehai Zhang (07/07/2005 06:30). This is really sad
> because I really like Xen and WOULD like to use it...
The memory ballooning needs to be fixed. I can't remember what release the
reported breakage was in - it's probably an easy fix either way. The break
probably went unnoticed because people usually don't balloon domains above
their initial allocation.
HTH,
Mark
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
| |
|
Home