|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
Re: [Xen-users] iSCSI Initiator anyone?
Oh, on another note, I'm curious as to how you've used iSCSI with Xen
(e.g. stability, scalability, performance). I ran the usual bonnie++
benchmarks to get I/O throughput, but from informal testing I get
slightly much better performance with NFS. And on reliability, it
seems that Linux is much better at handling NFS servers going away
rather than iSCSI Targets going away...
- gino
On 6/26/05, Gino LV. Ledesma <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Still remember which changes you made? I'm still in the process of
> doing the tweaks myself to compile properly. I've gotten unh_iscsi to
> work and it seems to be pretty ok, though I still haven't gotten the
> hang of getting multiple LUNs from one target -- linux-iscsi's
> iscsiadm --sendtargets makes that part easy.
>
> - gino
>
>
> On 6/26/05, Kip Macy <kip.macy@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > linux-iscsi worked fine for me. It required some tweaking to compile
> > against 2.6.11
> >
> > On 6/13/05, Gino LV. Ledesma <gledesma@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > Hi, list
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried out a SCSI Initiator with Xen? I'm currently looking
> > > at linux-iscsi[1] and open-scsi[2]. So far, linux-iscsi 4.0.x fails on
> > > compile and linux-iscsi 5.0.x (same codebase as open-scsi) does a
> > > kernel stack trace upon initiating a session with an iSCSI Target,
> > > regardless if it's done in dom-0 or dom-U.
> > >
> > > Looking at the xen-devel list some recent posts have the same inquiry,
> > > but no answers yet. :-)
> > >
> > > - gino
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Xen-users mailing list
> > > Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
> > >
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|