WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

[Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] gcc 4.0.0 and xen-devel

I checkout bktree from bk://xen.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable.bk 
and now I'm getting these messages:

make world or make dist

<snip>
gcc -nostdinc -fno-builtin -fno-common -fno-strict-aliasing -iwithprefix
include -Wall -Werror -Wno-pointer-arith -pipe
-I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include
-I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-generic
-I/home/fbl/xeno-unstable.bk/xen/include/asm-x86/mach-default -O3
-fomit-frame-pointer -msoft-float -m32 -march=i686 -DNDEBUG -c i8259.c
-o i8259.o
{standard input}: Assembler messages:
{standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:6: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
{standard input}:1296: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `mov'
<snip>


On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 11:02:21AM -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> This problem has been corrected. Fix is in the latest BK source tree.
> 
> On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:20 -0500, David F Barrera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-06-07 at 17:08 -0300, Flavio Leitner wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hello!
> > > 
> > > I tried to compile xen 2.0.6 with gcc 4.0.0 and got lots of warnings
> > > like:
> > > 
> > > 'warning: pointer targets in passing argument X of 'function' differ in
> > > signedness' 
> > > 
> > I am seeing the same thing on xen-unstable (xen devel 3.0) and GCC 4.0.0
> > on a FC4 platform. 
> > I submitted a defect on the Xensource Bugzilla, "Bugzilla Bug 73 
> > gcc4 build break ...", to track this issue.
> > 
> > > Is there any intention of compile xen stable/unstable with gcc 4.0.0? 
> > > 
> > > Thanks!
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> David F Barrera
> Linux Technology Center
> Systems and Technology Group, IBM
> 
> "The wisest men follow their own direction. "
>                                                         Euripides
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

-- 
Flávio Bruno Leitner <fbl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[0EA2 7F40 4CF4 1E63 4AF6  33C0 3E10 E205 F251 EDDA]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel