WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-users

Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related to ne

To: Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related to network interface
From: Sebastian Gutweiler <sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 13:40:58 +0200
Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 10 May 2005 11:39:37 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20050509155545.GA32031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-users@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-users>, <mailto:xen-users-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <200505061840.33967.sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20050509155545.GA32031@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.8
On Monday 09 May 2005 17:55, Nick Craig-Wood wrote:

Hi,

> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:40:33PM +0200, sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I have a porblem with the unprivileged kernel. When I start my domain
> > using the unprivileged kernel I get the message:
> >
> > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
> >  [<c011f3c0>] local_bh_enable+0x80/0x90
> >  [<c0223089>] skb_checksum+0x129/0x2a0
> >  [<c026736c>] udp_poll+0x9c/0x150
> >  [<c021e409>] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
> >  [<c016ba3e>] do_select+0x25e/0x2d0
> >  [<c016b630>] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
> >  [<c016bd9f>] sys_select+0x2bf/0x4d0
> >  [<c01093f4>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> We are still having this problem too.  We only have it on some hosts,
> not others so its related to some activity in the domUs - we haven't
> figured out what though.  The backtrace suggests UDP traffic

I experience this, too. Actually the reappearing of the message in the 
dom0-logs is caused by my dhcp-client regularly sending UDP-Packets.

> I'm prety sure we didn't miscompile our modules - I disassembled them
> to check for cli/sti.  The kernel was compiled using

I'm almost sure, too. 

>   make-kpkg --arch xen --append_to_version -xen --revision=2.6.11
> kernel_image
>
> We see this with the e1000 driver, using kernel 2.6.11.7 + debian
> patches + xen stable 2.0.5, on dell poweredge 750 hardware.

Same kernel here, but xen-testing which is about 5-6 days old.

My kernel who has this problem was compiled with Debian's standard 
kernel .config but ISA-Bus-Support disabled. 

I compiled a standard xen0 kernel for testing with only some extra drivers 
enabled. It turned out that this kernel did not have this problem.

I will compile the standard Debian-kernel without e1000 support and retry this 
kernel.

> No functionality appears to be affected, other than 1000s of these
> messages in the log.

I experience notable higer packet packet drops when pinging dom0-host from an 
domU-host with hughe packet sizes, e.g. ping -s 8008 dom0-host. It's about 
30% when using the kernel with the problem, about 0% when using the standard 
dom0-kernel-configuration.

Sebastian 

_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users