|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonet
> On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 06:40:33PM +0200,
> sebastian@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > I have a porblem with the unprivileged kernel. When I start
> my domain
> > using the unprivileged kernel I get the message:
> >
> > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140 [<c011f3c0>]
> > local_bh_enable+0x80/0x90 [<c0223089>] skb_checksum+0x129/0x2a0
> > [<c026736c>] udp_poll+0x9c/0x150 [<c021e409>] sock_poll+0x29/0x40
> > [<c016ba3e>] do_select+0x25e/0x2d0 [<c016b630>]
> __pollwait+0x0/0xd0
> > [<c016bd9f>] sys_select+0x2bf/0x4d0 [<c01093f4>]
> syscall_call+0x7/0xb
Are these messages coming out on the dom0 or domU console?
Can you repeat on 2.0-testing or unstable?
Does anyone see this that's using a NIC other than an e1000?
Thanks,
Ian
> We are still having this problem too. We only have it on
> some hosts, not others so its related to some activity in the
> domUs - we haven't figured out what though. The backtrace
> suggests UDP traffic
>
> I'm prety sure we didn't miscompile our modules - I
> disassembled them to check for cli/sti. The kernel was compiled using
>
> make-kpkg --arch xen --append_to_version -xen
> --revision=2.6.11 kernel_image
>
> We see this with the e1000 driver, using kernel 2.6.11.7 +
> debian patches + xen stable 2.0.5, on dell poweredge 750 hardware.
>
> No functionality appears to be affected, other than 1000s of
> these messages in the log.
>
> --
> Nick Craig-Wood <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --
> http://www.craig-wood.com/nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-users mailing list
> Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-users] Badness in softirq.c / no modules loaded / related tonetwork interface,
Ian Pratt <=
|
|
|
|
|