|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-users
RE: [Xen-users] Badness in local_bh_enable
Le vendredi 01 avril 2005 à 10:08 +0100, Ian Pratt a écrit :
> > i am not sure if this is related, but i discovered it after installing
> > xen: i've got the following message in dmesg:
> >
> > Badness in local_bh_enable at kernel/softirq.c:140
> > [<c011f740>] local_bh_enable+0x80/0x90 [<c02572f9>]
> > skb_checksum+0x129/0x2b0 [<c02c7a86>] schedule+0x306/0x530
> > [<c029036c>] udp_poll+0x9c/0x150 [<c0252769>]
> > sock_poll+0x29/0x40 [<c016a079>] do_pollfd+0x89/0x90
> > [<c016a0ea>] do_poll+0x6a/0xd0 [<c016a296>]
> > sys_poll+0x146/0x230 [<c011edfb>] sys_gettimeofday+0x3b/0x80
> > [<c0169670>] __pollwait+0x0/0xd0 [<c01096b8>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
>
> I'll wager that you're trying to use modules compiled for a non-Xen
> kernel.
>
> > it doesnot seems to be harmful but i just dont like it.
>
> You're living very dangerously.
>
> When building modules outside of the kernel tree make sure you use 'make
> ARCH=xen'.
thanks for the quick answer.
so what is the proper procedure for building a xen kernel ?
this is what i do, knowing that xen sources are located
in /xen/xen-2.0 :
# cd /xen/xen-2.0/linux-2.6.10-xen0/
# make menuconfig ARCH=xen
...
# cd /xen/xen-2.0/
# make
# ./install.sh
am i missing something ?
regards
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
|
|
|
|