RE: [Xen-tools] Confirm remaining xm interface changes

["Ian Pratt" <m+Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I am working to collect all of the suggestions to Sean's 
> previous RFC on the xm interface, so that I can make the 
> remaining changes.  Below is a list of the remaining proposed 
> command name changes, as gathered from the list discussion:
> 
>   Current          Proposed
>   ------------------------------------
>   cpus-set         vcpu-set-affinity
>   bvt              sched-bvt
>   bvt_ctxallow     sched-bvt_ctxallow

let's stick to hyphens 

>   sedf             sched-sedf
>   block-create     block-attach
>   block-destroy    block-detach

We should also add place holders for netif-attach/detach
 
> There was also some discussion about changing the mem-set 
> command, but I didn't see a clear winner.  Personally, I am 
> fine with mem-set.

I guess mem-set is OK.

Ian


_______________________________________________
Xen-tools mailing list
Xen-tools@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-tools