Re: [XenPPC] One more fix for the forward port

To:	Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [XenPPC] One more fix for the forward port
From:	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2007 14:20:50 -0500
Cc:	xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 05 Jul 2007 12:18:44 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<1183658827.14342.47.camel@basalt>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization:	IBM Linux Technology Center
References:	<4677C2DE.8040703@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1182280864.9062.71.camel@basalt> <467A82DC.1040302@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1183658827.14342.47.camel@basalt>
Reply-to:	Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Thu, 2007-07-05 at 13:07 -0500, Hollis Blanchard wrote:

> Hi Christian, as far as I can see the vast majority of this patch is
> not needed; the only part that's required is
> phys_to_machine_mapping_valid(). 

I take it back. Not sure how I wasn't seeing this before...

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [XenPPC] One more fix for the forward port, Hollis Blanchard Re: [XenPPC] One more fix for the forward port, Hollis Blanchard <=

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-ppc-devel

Re: [XenPPC] One more fix for the forward port