WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ppc-devel

[XenPPC] Missing function __xchg_called_with_bad_pointer .. what todo ?

To: xen-ppc-devel <xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [XenPPC] Missing function __xchg_called_with_bad_pointer .. what todo ?
From: Jerone Young <jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 01:22:08 -0500
Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 23:20:48 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM
Reply-to: jyoung5@xxxxxxxxxx
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So now that __xchg has started to be used we have a problem building
xen-syms as the function __xchg_called_with_bad_pointer used in
"include/asm-powerpc/system.h" does not exist (see line 73).

I get a linker error but it's for an udefined reference:

/XEN/xen-unstable.hg/xen/common/built_in.o: In function `__xchg':
/XEN/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/system.h:84: undefined reference to
`__xchg_called_with_bad_pointer'
/XEN/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/system.h:84: undefined reference to
`__xchg_called_with_bad_pointer'
/XEN/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/system.h:84: undefined reference to
`__xchg_called_with_bad_pointer'
/XEN/xen-unstable.hg/xen/include/asm/system.h:84: undefined reference to
`__xchg_called_with_bad_pointer'



Is there a better way to do this check?


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>