xen-ppc-devel

[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes

from [poff]

[Permanent Link][Original]

To:	butrico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject:	Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes
From:	poff <poff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Thu, 7 Dec 2006 16:38:52 -0500
Cc:	xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:38:59 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<45771141.40505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (butrico@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
List-help:	<mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<45771141.40505@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> cso89:~ # netstat -rn
> netstat -rn
> Kernel IP routing table
> Destination     Gateway         Genmask         Flags   MSS Window  irtt 
> Iface
> 9.2.78.1        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.255 UH        0 0          0 
> eth0
> 9.2.78.0        0.0.0.0         255.255.255.0   U         0 0          0 
> eth1
> 169.254.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U         0 0          0 
> eth0
> 192.168.0.0     0.0.0.0         255.255.0.0     U         0 0          0 
> eth0
> 127.0.0.0       0.0.0.0         255.0.0.0       U         0 0          0 lo
> 0.0.0.0         9.2.78.1        0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0 
> eth0
> 0.0.0.0         9.2.78.1        0.0.0.0         UG        0 0          0 
> eth1
>
>
> The next to last route is bogus and interferes with the proper operation 
> of the machine as far as the network goes.   I am not sure what the 
> first route in the list above is all about, but seems strange as well.  
> In any case it was not there before. 


Not clear how this happened, but can fix the problem by deleting the eth0 
gateway, 'route del ...'

Multiple gateways occur when a second gateway is added without deleting the 
original gateway,
eg with 'route add gw...' However, in this case, the eth0 should not have been 
added, as you
point-out.

_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[XenPPC] xend and routes, Maria Butrico Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff <= Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, Jimi Xenidis Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, Jimi Xenidis Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, Jimi Xenidis Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, poff

Previous by Date:	Re: [XenPPC] Xen and firmware RTAS, Jimi Xenidis
Next by Date:	Re: [XenPPC] [RFC] 'xm restore' following boot, poff
Previous by Thread:	[XenPPC] xend and routes, Maria Butrico
Next by Thread:	Re: [XenPPC] xend and routes, Jimi Xenidis
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]