Re: [Xen-devel] [patch] [3/3] dom0_ops explicitly sized types

[Chris Wright <chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

* Hollis Blanchard (hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-05-26 at 17:27 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > 
> > Anyway, regardless of any opinion expressed here the Linux gatekeepers
> > will no doubt insist on __uN. We might as well do it now as change it
> > later.
> 
> And where will userspace, e.g. tools/libxc/xc_linux.c, find the
> definition of __u64?

Same place they do for the rest of shared headers (glib-kernheaders,
for example).  Please use the proper form (u64 internal to kernel, and
__u64 for header visisble to userspace).  I'm going to have to clean it
up anyway.

thanks,
-chris

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel