|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-merge
[Xen-merge] fs/gs handling
 
Any reason that fs/gs are specifically handled with mov not movl in
these cases?
 #define deactivate_mm(tsk, mm) \
-       asm("movl %0,%%fs ; movl %0,%%gs": :"r" (0))
+       asm("mov %0,%%fs ; mov %0,%%gs": :"r" (0))
or
+static inline void __prepare_arch_switch(void)
...
+       __asm__ __volatile__ ( "mov %%fs,%0 ; mov %%gs,%1"
+               : "=m" (*(int *)¤t->thread.fs),
+                 "=m" (*(int *)¤t->thread.gs));
+       __asm__ __volatile__ ( "mov %0,%%fs ; mov %0,%%gs"
+               : : "r" (0) );
_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread>
 |  
- [Xen-merge] fs/gs handling,
Chris Wright <=
 
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |