|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-merge
Re: [Xen-merge] io_apic.c, part 1
 
> OK, this is roughly what happens if you do this, without pissing around
> with all the makefiles and include headers for func declarations etc.
> Yes, there's a lot less ifdefs. Not sure I like it any better personally,
> and it's going to be a pig to maintain out of tree. Opinions?
It looks better, but some logical ordering of the functions which
remain and which are moved would be nice.
I would suggest to do it and then merge early in 2.6.14. I can follow
on x86-64 then.
-Andi
_______________________________________________
Xen-merge mailing list
Xen-merge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-merge
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |