|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: Getting rid of Xen heap
Hi Keir.
I suppose it wouldn't very difficult. I'll try it and see what it goes.
But daemons live in details...
thanks
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 03:58:09PM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote:
> Hi Isaku, and other IA64 people,
>
> In xen-unstable c/s 19054 I get rid of the statically-partitioned Xen heap
> for x86_64. Now the domain and Xen heaps are unified, and the Xen heap
> 'semantics' are a thin wrapper around the unified heap.
>
> It would be nice to do the same for IA64 -- like x86/64 it has 1:1 mapping
> of all memory, so the static partitioning of Xen heap is not necessary. Also
> I can then make the statically-partitioned Xen heap a 32-bit x86 special
> case and push some of the code under arch/x86/x86_32 as is appropriate.
>
> What do you think? If you look, I think you'll see it's not hard to do. You
> could keep using init_xenheap_pages() for now and really the hardest bit is
> getting rid of xenheap_phys_start/end variables and move over to a
> PGC_xen_heap page_info flag instead (needed since Xen heap pages have
> different deallocation semantics).
>
> I suppose this might affect kdump since it won't dump Xen heap objects any
> more, but I didn't want to keep the tiny Xen heap partition only for that
> reason!
>
> -- Keir
>
>
>
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Re: Getting rid of Xen heap,
Isaku Yamahata <=
|
|
|
|
|