On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 03:43:18PM +0900, Masaki Kanno wrote:
> I'm not sure that the check is required, though, I think that the
> message is noisy. So, I make a proposal that replaces the printk()
> by gdprintk(XENLOG_DEBUG, ...). What do you think?
Sounds reasonable.
But looking around faults.c, many printk()'s without XENLOG_xxx
are used. Perhaps it's good time to clean up all of them.
>
> Best regards,
> Kan
>
> Fri, 11 Apr 2008 17:21:34 +0900 (JST), "KUWAMURA Shin'ya" wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >Running i386 version LMbench on IA32-EL of dom0 generates many
> >message outputs: # tens of lines per a second
> > (XEN) ia64_handle_reflection: handling regNaT fault
> >
> >Is the check required?
> >
> >I attached the patch that remove printk().
> >
> >How to reproduce:
> >1. build LMbench on an i386 machine
> >2. run par_mem on ia64
> > cd <LMbench directory>/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu
> > ./par_mem -L 128 -M 16M
> >
> >Best Regards,
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>
--
yamahata
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home