|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives
Yang, Fred wrote:
> Dong, Eddie wrote:
>> Re-post it to warmup discussion in case people can't read PPT format,
>
> IVT is very performance sensitive for the native Linux, how about
> dual IVT tables alternative for CPU virtualization? It would need
> maintainance effort but it would be much cleaner forIA64 situation.
> -Fred
Dual IVT table could be a night mare for Tony, I guess. But yes we
need to have more active discussion to kick it off.
Tony:
I think this discussion shouldn't exclude IA64 Linux
community (at least for those active members), will u like us to post
this kind of discussion to IA64 community? Or do u have list of people
who are most interested?
I want to kick off some high level discussion.
thx, eddie
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives,
Dong, Eddie <=
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Alex Williamson
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Yang, Fred
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
- Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Isaku Yamahata
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] paravirt_ops and its alternatives, Dong, Eddie
|
|
|
|
|