Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?

On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 03:45:03AM +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:

> for metaphysical mode, we use two different alternate rids (one for rr0 and
> one for rr4).  Because they use the same mapping why don't we use the
> same rid for both rr0 and rr4 ?

This sounds a good idea.


> This should avoid duplicate entries in the VHPT.

VHPT entry includes memory attribute bits(cachable v.s. uncachable).

-- 
yamahata

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Tristan Gingold Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Isaku Yamahata <= Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Tristan Gingold

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Tristan Gingold

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch 08/16] kexec/kdump: Minor enhancement to includes in crash.c, Horms

Previous by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Tristan Gingold

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] Why metaphysical rid rr0 and rr4 ?, Tristan Gingold

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]