Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] cleanup warning of UC|WB attributep

Hi, Alex

>On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 09:58 +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
>> 
>> BTW, I also thought another approch to prevent these case.
>> Because these memory area is accessed as both UC and WB,
>> we need to use new flag. 
>> (For example _PAGE_MA_UCE, I'm not sure we can use this flag for UC|WB.
>> or should we make new flag?)
>> 
>> In consideration of stability, I didn't make new flag.
>> (Because I must check many part of memory access.)
>> Which approch do you prefer? or another suggestion?
>
>   That does sound rather involved.  Unless others think the UCE page is
>a better way to go, perhaps we should use something like the approach
>you're suggesting.  Newer upstream efi.c has a efi_mem_attribute()
>function that will give you the attributes for a given range of memory.
>Rather than implementing yet another EFI memmap walking routine, what do
>you think about updating efi.c to a newer upstream version and making
>use of this function?  Thanks,
Thank you for your comments.

I'll check whether It is possible easy to port new efi.c to xen. 

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Re: PATCH: cleanup in faults.c, Alex Williamson

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] Xen/IA64 Healthiness Report -Cset#15044, You, Yongkang

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] cleanup warning of UC|WB attributepage, Alex Williamson

Next by Thread:

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] cleanup warning of UC|WB attributepage, Akio Takebe

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]