Oh, I forgot restart xend last time.
But this time I get another error info. See attachment
Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
-Wing(zhang xin)
OTC,Intel Corporation
-----Original Message-----
From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 2006年11月7日 14:55
To: Zhang, Xing Z; Masaki Kanno; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Akio Takebe
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
Hi, Wing
Could you try it again after "xend stop; xend start".
Best Regards,
Akio Takebe
>New GFW will release soon, I think it's today.
>I used your merge.patch but failed. Seems some problems in python code.
>Attachment is a picture show the issue
>
>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>-Wing(zhang xin)
>
>OTC,Intel Corporation
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Akio Takebe [mailto:takebe_akio@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: 2006年11月7日 13:39
>To: Zhang, Xing Z; Masaki Kanno; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>
>Hi, Wing
>
>I don't know, but if you give me newer GFW,
>we'll test "xm os-init" on windows of domVTi.
>
>Best Regards,
>
>Akio Takebe
>
>>I still have a question:
>> How windows OS_INIT handler do? How can I confirm whether PAL_INIT executed
>> successful in windows? ( in Linux , I can see a lot of dump info on screen)
>>
>>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>>-Wing(zhang xin)
>>
>>OTC,Intel Corporation
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Masaki Kanno [mailto:kanno.masaki@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>Sent: 2006ト・1ヤツ6ネユ 18:18
>>To: Zhang, Xing Z; xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>>
>>Hi Zhang,
>>
>>We were looking forward to your patches.
>>We have a question and a comment.
>>
>>Question:
>> How can we inject the INIT interrupt into domVTi?
>> We made xm os-init command, and tested your patch.
>> But INIT handler of domVTi was not executed, we think.
>> We attach two files.
>> - merge.patch : It is a patch that we tested.
>> - xenctx.log : It is a cpu-context of domVTi after we test.
>>
>>Comment:
>> We think that TODO line is unnecessary.
>>
>>@@ -404,7 +419,7 @@ static void deliver_ipi (VCPU *vcpu, uin
>> break;
>> case 5: // INIT
>> // TODO -- inject guest INIT <---------- This!
>>- panic_domain (NULL, "Inject guest INIT!\n");
>>+ vmx_inject_guest_pal_init(vcpu);
>> break;
>> case 7: // ExtINT
>> vmx_vcpu_pend_interrupt (vcpu, 0);
>>
>>Best regards,
>> Kan and Akio
>>
>>>This patch add guest PAL_INIT support for IPI
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Signed-off-by, Zhang Xin < xing.z.zhang@xxxxxxxxx
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Good good study,day day up ! ^_^
>>>
>>>-Wing(zhang xin)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>OTC,Intel Corporation
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-------------------------------text/plain-------------------------------
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>>Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
xm_os_init2.png
Description: xm_os_init2.png
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home
