WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

Re: [XenPPC] Xencomm on ia64 - The patches

To: Tristan Gingold <Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XenPPC] Xencomm on ia64 - The patches
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollisb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 16:21:53 -0500
Cc: xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-ia64-devel <xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:21:24 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <200608181802.17641.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen PPC development <xen-ppc-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ppc-devel>, <mailto:xen-ppc-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: IBM Linux Technology Center
References: <200608181802.17641.Tristan.Gingold@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-ppc-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2006-08-18 at 18:02 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
> these are the patches to port xencomm on ia64.  This is just an RFC.  I have 
> to clean-up the code so that it could be shared between ia64 and ppc.

Great! Your patches were a little noisy though; they had some unrelated
and whitespace changes.

> I have added the xencomm_inline feature which makes (IMHO) hcall.c more 
> readable and safer (particularly at boot time).  Wether or not xencomm_mini 
> should be deprecated is a question for ppc people (xencomm_mini is buggy: the 
> area should be reserved as an array of struct xencomm_mini for alignment).

Good point.

> I have also fixed a few bugs in guest_access.h

Do you think you could split those out as a diff to
xen/include/asm-powerpc/guest_access.h, to be applied before we move it?

> Many files should be shared between ia64 and ppc.
> In xen:
> * guest_access.h should be the same.  I will propose to put as 
> include/xen/xencomm_access.h

And then xen/include/asm-{powerpc,ia64}/guest_access.h would just
#include <xen/xencomm_access.h>? Sounds good to me.

> * usercopy.c sould be shared too.  The paddr_to_maddr() function should be 
> defined in arch files as xencomm_paddr_to_maddr.  I will propose to put this 
> file into xen/common/xencomm.c

Agreed.

> In linux:
> * drivers/xen/core/xencomm.c should be shared.  We just need to agree on
> xen_pa().  On linux-ia64, __pa() doesn't work for this use.  asm/xencomm.h 
> should define this macro/function.

We got rid of __kern_paddr entirely, so __pa() shouldn't be a problem.
If you check the current PPC tree (specifically changeset 0b82e0cba7d3),
you'll find we always use the follow_vma() routine now. Please make sure
you pull down that changeset, as I'd hate to lose changes because you
were working from something older.

> * hcall.c should be shared because it is the biggest and the most boring 
> file.  
> This won't be that easy, but it will try to made a proposal soon.

Sure.

-- 
Hollis Blanchard
IBM Linux Technology Center


_______________________________________________
Xen-ppc-devel mailing list
Xen-ppc-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ppc-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>