On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 15:57 +0800, Xu, Anthony wrote:
> >
> >Below fixes may be more efficient, and there was this logic, but was removed
> >by accident
>
> I got what you mean, these two patch are both needed.
Hi Anthony,
Please submit a proper patch for the below if you want it in the
tree. Thanks,
Alex
> >diff -r 6f02c4b9a9d0 xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vtlb.c
> > 135 --- a/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vtlb.c Wed Aug 09 12:05:13 2006 +0800
> > 136 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vtlb.c Fri Aug 11 09:54:37 2006 +0800
> > 137 @@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void vtlb_purge(VCPU *v, u64 va, u64 ps)
> > 138 psbits = VMX(v, psbits[(va >> 61)]);
> > 139 size = PSIZE(ps);
> > 140 start = va & (-size);
> > 141 - end = start + size;
> > 142 + end = start + size -1;
> > 143 while (psbits) {
> > 144 curadr = start;
> > 145 ps = __ffs(psbits);
> > 146 @@ -281,7 +281,7 @@ static void vhpt_purge(VCPU *v, u64 va,
> > 147 ia64_rr rr;
> > 148 size = PSIZE(ps);
> > 149 start = va & (-size);
> > 150 - end = start + size;
> > 151 + end = start + size -1;
> > 152 rr.rrval = ia64_get_rr(va);
> > 153 size = PSIZE(rr.ps);
> > 154 while(start < end){
--
Alex Williamson HP Open Source & Linux Org.
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
Home