Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] catch up new hypercall HYPERVISR_hvm_op for IPF

[Doi.Tsunehisa@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Hi,

  Thank you for your comment.

You (Tristan.Gingold) said:
> I'd prefer do_hvm_op to be in xen/ and not in vmx/.  All the hypercalls are 
> there.

  In x86 code, do_hvm_op is implemented in hvm/hvm.c, thus we have
implemented in vmx/. And we will implement IPF specific feature to
port paravirtualized driver for VT-i domain.

> It is a little bit strange that HVMOP_get_param returns the parameter by 
> value 
> and not in memory.  I suppose you have copied x86 hypercalls here.
> index can't be < 0 as it is unsigned.

  You are right. We have copied it from x86 code. For porting, we need
that interface should be same with x86, I think.
--
ÅÚÈî¤Ç¤·¤¿¡¥¡¥¡¥

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel