RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] [2/4] Support INIT handler of xen

Hi, Kevin

Thank you for your comments.

>Hi, Akio,
>       Could you explain why you need to fix LOAD_PHYSICAL like 
>that way? Instead of expanding one instruction to three with 
>dependencies, why not pull dynamic patch mechanism from linux 
>(arch/ia64/kernel/patch.c) which is not a big effort? :-)
>
I did it because I thought this way was easy.
As you say, I also think dynamic patch is better than mine.
This patch is workaround.
I'll try to make dynamic patch mechanism.

Best Regards,

Akio Takebe


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] [2/4] Support INIT handler of xen, Tian, Kevin RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] [2/4] Support INIT handler of xen, Akio Takebe <=

Previous by Date:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] [2/4] Support INIT handler of xen, Tian, Kevin

Next by Date:

[Xen-ia64-devel] First save & restore, Tristan Gingold

Previous by Thread:

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [patch] [2/4] Support INIT handler of xen, Tian, Kevin

Next by Thread:

[Xen-ia64-devel] First save & restore, Tristan Gingold

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]