|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS in domain.c
To: |
"Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "Dong, Eddie" <eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx>, "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>, "Isaku Yamahata" <yamahata@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS in domain.c |
From: |
"Yang, Fred" <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:51:40 -0800 |
Cc: |
xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 01 Mar 2006 00:52:04 +0000 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcY8Ks2PGQpymMWOQ9Othys6NU6q4wAAr5wgABW1vuAADcTNYAAA92fwAAKSPoA= |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-ia64-devel] CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS in domain.c |
I believe Isaku can do P2M conditional build, ie. Add #if P2M #else ...
for the existing build. Once he got code in, people can start utilize
the code for stablizing. P2M can be gone after that.
-Fred
Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
> This isn't a performance issue. I don't think domain0/U
> will function correctly with CONFIG_...CONTIGUOUS undef'd
> until all of Isaku's necessary VP+DMA changes (in Xen,
> Xenlinux, Xen drivers, and possibly tools) are complete.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Dong, Eddie [mailto:eddie.dong@xxxxxxxxx]
>> Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2006 4:19 PM
>> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins); Tian, Kevin;
>> Isaku Yamahata
>> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS in domain.c
>>
>> Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
>>> to VP. HOWEVER... it may be possible and desirable
>>> for much of Isaku's work to support both VP and P==M.
>>> For non-I/O code, CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS could be
>>> used (or possibly renamed) to select VP or P==M at
>>> compile-time, at least until the conversion to VP+DMA
>>> is complete. This would allow at least some of Isaku's
>> As if eventually we will remove this code, putting an compile
>> option now is OK IMO. But I think the default one should be
>> #undefed by some pre-cleanip patch now so that people can
>> find issues earlier if there have.
>> #undef this one can support no matter p==m or p!=m, while
>> #define this can only support p==m. Yes maybe we will see
>> 0.5% performance degradation with #undef, but this is a
>> functionality must as we all go toward p!=m :-(
>> After the whole p2m/VP patch comes out, we can then do more
>> performance tuning :-) Eddie
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] CONFIG_DOMAIN0_CONTIGUOUS in domain.c,
Yang, Fred <=
|
|
|
|
|