|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-ia64-devel
RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again
O, didn't noticed the attached patch is different with the 2 lines patch
in your email :-(
BTW, in Xen/X86, the local_softirq_pending() check is in low level code
(test_all_events in arch/x86/x86_32/entry.S), and it repeats to
process_softirqs until there is no pending soft IRQs. That makes the new
generated soft IRQs within last round of process_softirqs can be handled
timely.
But, yes that can be done in later callback/failback support patch :-)
Eddie
Xu, Anthony wrote:
> Keir,
>
> Sorry for the confusion, Pls delete the earlier one, the second one
> is an update per alex's request. So Pls only check in the second
> patch.
>
> Thanks,
> -Anthony
>
_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again, Dong, Eddie
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again, Xu, Anthony
- RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Xen-devel] [PATCH]Make VTIdomain boot again,
Dong, Eddie <=
|
|
|
|
|