WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-ia64-devel

RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable

To: "Magenheimer, Dan \(HP Labs Fort Collins\)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>, "Byrne, John \(HP Labs\)" <john.l.byrne@xxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
From: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 10:09:48 +0800
Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:07:32 +0000
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Discussion of the ia64 port of Xen <xen-ia64-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-ia64-devel>, <mailto:xen-ia64-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcWvZqLq66NFDvT0SxG0t4WzIxQpTQAANxPQAPEyzMAABo/zoAAhfg1QABNlThA=
Thread-topic: [Xen-ia64-devel] Community effort neededtocatch upwithxen-unstable
>From: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)
>
>> >I hadn't yet applied this patch as I recall there was some
discussion
>> >about doing it differently.  Should I go ahead and apply it and
>> >we will fix it later?
>>
>> Go ahead since it's related to correctness of second domain.
>> We can enhance it later.
>
>Done.

Thanks,

>
>> BTW, I'll send out the tools change
>> to xen mailing list, since some common code is changed upon ia64.
>
>Yes, it will be interesting to see if it gets in.  I hope it
>does, but in the past Keir has been resistant to ifdef code.
>
>Please keep track of it and let us all know if it gets in!
>
>Dan

Yes, too many ifdefs are unacceptable. If the news is bad, we have to
find other way, like trying to catch up with x86 behavior closely to
reduce such branches. ;-(

Thanks,
Kevin

_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>