|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-ia64-devel
[Xen-ia64-devel] Réf. : RE: How is the basic tree coming? SMP  support o
 
 Dan,
 
 I want to let you know that Bull is interested by the SMP support for Itanium platforms.
 We have started to work on the support of "SMP host" on Itanium VT multiprocessor systems.
 We will of course communicate with you (the Xen IA64 man) through this mailing list for a good synchronization with other developments, and mainly with the SMP support in the paravirtualized Linux and the support of SMP guest.
 
 Regards
 Jean-Paul
 
 
 
 
| 
 | "Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins)" <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxx>
 Envoyé par : xen-ia64-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/09/2005 02:47
 
  |         
         Pour :        "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>
         cc :        xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
         Objet :        [Xen-ia64-devel] RE: How is the basic tree coming? |   
 
 Sorry... 99% of the changes I've committed have been 
maintenance, namely getting Xen/ia64 to compile with 
CONFIG_SMP (which can't even be turned off on Xen/x86) 
and catching the code up to the latest linux release. 
I wasn't intending to add new functionality or impact 
the multi-domain effort.  I did get curious to see how 
far the SMP boot was getting and added some printk's 
and missing code (that was already in Xen/x86) 
but gave up on that rather quickly due to needing 
to do other maintenance activities (2.6.13).  Rather 
than throw away useful debugging code, I checked it in. 
 
Last, I've been cleaning up some linux files that 
were changed (without ifdef's) and doing some minor 
restructuring following Arun's removal of the mkbuildtree 
patch process. 
 
I still have some more 2.6.13 work, but it should 
be done tomorrow. 
 
If any of this maintenance interfered with the multi-domain 
repair, I apologize.  But it seemed like it was orthogonal 
so a good time to do it.  (And if anyone else wants to 
volunteer to do my boring maintenance tasks, please 
let me know :-) 
 
Dan 
 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Tian, Kevin [mailto:kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx]  
> Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 6:31 PM 
> To: Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) 
> Cc: xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: How is the basic tree coming?  
>  
> Hi, Dan, 
>                  Per your previous mail, you said: 
> >>>> I would like to solicit (or maybe beg!) for your help 
> >>>> in bug-hunting and bug-fixing to bring xen-ia64 back 
> >>>> to the previous functionality (e.g. multiple domains 
> >>>> working with grant tables, console and blk drivers). 
> >>>> Some of you may have participated in implementation 
> >>>> and debugging of the equivalent driver code on the x86 side 
> >>>> and your help especially would be greatly appreciated. 
> >>>> I see this as a community effort...  
> ################################ 
> >>>>I do not expect to 
> >>>> accept new functionality patches until this is all 
> >>>> working again. 
> ############################### 
> >>>>  
> >>>> Thanks, 
> >>>> Dan 
>  
>                  While xen-ia64-unstable  
>  
> 15 hours ago: Baby step toward host SMP support   
> changeset 6453: 44316ce83277  
> parent 6452: f5c4042212b0  
> tag: tip  
> author: djm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
> date: Tue Aug 30 23:51:51 2005  
> files: xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/mm_contig.c  
> xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smp.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smpboot.c xen/arch/ia64/vcpu.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/xenmisc.c xen/arch/ia64/xensetup.c   
> 20 hours ago: Enable CONFIG_SMP compile and link   
> changeset 6452: f5c4042212b0  
> parent 6451: 2b95125015a5  
> author: djm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
> date: Tue Aug 30 18:41:54 2005  
> files: xen/arch/ia64/hyperprivop.S xen/arch/ia64/irq.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/irq_ia64.c xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/mm_contig.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/sal.c xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smp.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/linux-xen/smpboot.c xen/arch/ia64/process.c 
> xen/arch/ia64/xensetup.c xen/arch/ia64/xentime.c ... 
>  
>                  Self-contradictory? Why you are debugging MP and check in code 
> that is to make our basic tree effort harder? 
>  
> Thanks, 
> Kevin 
>  
 
_______________________________________________ 
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list 
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel 
 
 _______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- [Xen-ia64-devel] Réf. : RE: How is the basic tree coming? SMP  support on Itanium,
jean-paul . pigache <=
  
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |