RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] Synchronize xeno-unstable-ia64.bkwithxenlinux-ia64-2.6.11.bk

["Yang, Fred" <fred.yang@xxxxxxxxx>]

Mail got bounced?
VTI worked onlatest  xen-unstable.bk with init_idle() removed also
-Fred

Yang, Fred wrote:
> Dan,
> VTI is validated to work fine with  xeno-unstable-ia64.bk :)
> -Fred
> Magenheimer, Dan (HP Labs Fort Collins) wrote:
>> I just pushed some Xen/ia64 changesets (bug fixes and
>> tlb fault handling improvements from Matt Chapman) to
>> xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xeno-unstable-ia64.bk.
>> 
>> These changes are fully backwards-compatible with
>> "privified" versions of xenlinux but will not work with
>> older (than today!) versions of paravirtualized xenlinux
>> (e.g. xen-ia64.bkbits.net/xenlinux-ia64-2.6.11.bk).
>> 
>> The changes to xeno-unstable-ia64.bk have not been
>> pushed to xeno-unstable.bk yet, but they may be pushed
>> in the next couple of days.  They should not affect
>> VT-I support, but if someone with VT-I could pull the bits
>> and try them, I would appreciate it.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Dan
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
>> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
> Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel