WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Regression in 3.1 causes Xen to use wrong idle routine

To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: Regression in 3.1 causes Xen to use wrong idle routine
From: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 15:57:15 +0200
Cc: len.brown@xxxxxxxxx, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-acpi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 07:03:42 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20111026134843.GA31609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4EA7DFD1.9060608@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111026133003.GA6654@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4EA80CF2.5040309@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111026134843.GA31609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1
On 26.10.2011 15:48, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>> What about using the cpuidle_disabled() functionality and adhere to that?
>>> As so:
>>>
> .. snip..
>>
>> >From reading over it, this should work. Though I would be interested to hear
>> from the linux-acpi folks. Also to double check that calling pm_idle when
>> cpuidle.off was specified really is what is intended.
> 
> Oh yeah, definitly need the input from linux-acpi folks. And also to be 
> actually
> tested :-)

I can volunteer to do the testing. But I am lazy enough to hold back a bit as
someone may tell us this is completely the wrong way to fix it. :)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>