 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements
| To: | Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements |
| From: | Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 17:06:06 +0100 |
| Cc: | "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Delivery-date: | Thu, 20 Oct 2011 09:11:07 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=zHxkbMaYE9cinjsLCUCqfhdNEXjS5lijdNc5CqkrxTI=; b=tYETagxpPg6s+8gTeaATNzZ2gVdxZlX7AXpwJVCktctdNzksazioKIYAOEUbmp2qRu Ggp+F2VYwu7snn3pIKko+Wv2KtmBjupzXutF/MbhWETM1hmSh/Qxa1fACy0hig6mEBVv kVJoZ0gAS/3c34+DKeX5QkV12Qyxu41zuHNpM= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4EA0583B020000780005C8A8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Thread-index: | AcyPQixBPZxKdNMFzEuZZNNVLIZ9yA== |
| Thread-topic: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements |
| User-agent: | Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 20/10/2011 16:19, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I suppose there is a second argument that it shrinks the containing >> structures (struct domain, struct vcpu, struct irq_desc, ...) and maybe >> helps reduce our order!=0 allocations? > > Yes - that's what made me start taking over these Linux bits. What I > sent here just continues on that route. I was really hoping that we > wouldn't leave this in a half baked state. Has Linux gone wholesale down this route, then? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements, Keir Fraser |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/6 v2] xenbus: Support HVM backends, Daniel De Graaf |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements, Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/12] cpumask handling scalability improvements, Jan Beulich |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
