WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH RFC V2 3/5] jump_label: if a key has already been initialized, don't nop it out
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 18:20:47 -0400
Cc: arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, David Daney <david.daney@xxxxxxxxxx>, peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jason Baron <jbaron@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Glauber <jang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Richard Henderson <rth@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Michael Ellerman <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen Devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, the, "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:21:22 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E8E275F.6010801@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <cover.1317506051.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <477dead9647029012f93c651f2892ed0e86b89e7.1317506051.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <20111003150205.GB2462@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E89E28C.7010700@xxxxxxxx> <20111004141011.GA2520@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E8B3489.60902@xxxxxxxxx> <4E8CF348.4080405@xxxxxxxx> <4E8CF385.2080804@xxxxxxxxx> <4E8DEB19.1050509@xxxxxxxx> <20111006181055.GA2505@xxxxxxxxxx> <1317925615.4729.14.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E8DF870.6010000@xxxxxxxxxx> <1317929321.4729.17.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E8E20CD.5030207@xxxxxxxx> <1317938775.4729.29.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E8E275F.6010801@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 15:10 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 10/06/2011 03:06 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> But bear in mind, I'm not using jump-label for tracing.  While its
> important for the "disabled" state to be quick, performance of the
> "enabled" state is also important.

Sorry, I'm still thinking jump-label for tracing over.

But that said, having the nop match is the best of both worlds.

I think having a update_jumplabel.c that is just like the
record_mcount.c which modifies the code right after it was compiled is
the best thing to do. That is, have the assembler determine what size
jumps to use and update them to nops right in the object file before
linking. This should be rather trivial to do.

-- Steve



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>