WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] bug in vlan offload in dom0 3.0.0 kernel?

To: James Harper <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] bug in vlan offload in dom0 3.0.0 kernel?
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 12:08:25 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 03 Oct 2011 09:30:11 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01E5E231@trantor>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AEC6C66638C05B468B556EA548C1A77D01E5E231@trantor>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:33:44AM +1000, James Harper wrote:
> I've just upgraded some dom0's to 3.0.0 (debian kernel) and now my

From?
> vlan's aren't working properly. Traffic is transmitted and other devices
> on that vlan see that traffic, and the xen machine sees the tagged
> response on eth0 but the packet never makes it onto eth0.2 (vlan2). My
> setup is this:
> 
> br-wan
>     eth0.2 - physical network interface
>     vif1.0 - virtual backend interface for vm
> 
> Here's an attempt to describe what I'm seeing for transmit:
> 
> vm eth0 - untagged packet
> xen vif1.0 - untagged packet
> xen br-wan - untagged packet
> xen eth0.2 - untagged packet
> xen eth0 - tagged packet
> |
> router eth0 - tagged packet
> router eth0.2 - untagged packet
> 
> That all looks fine. The packets are tagged inside the vlan interface
> and then tagged once they appear on the physical trunk. For receive:
> 
> router eth0.2 - untagged packet
> router eth0 - tagged packet
> | 
> xen eth0 - tagged packet
> xen eth0.2 - nothing
> 
> The nics are Intel dual port gigabit adapters - 82576. There is at least
> one bug report describing similar behaviour to the above but that was
> back in 2.6.x.
> 
> Has anyone else seen this problem? And more importantly, might vswitch
> solve some of the above problems?

So.. just since that is probably the first thing you should have checked for,
but did your turn checksumming off?


> 
> Thanks
> 
> James
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>