> On 29 September 2011 21:01, Ian Campbell <
Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>         On Thu, 2011-09-29 at 11:53 +0100, Joseph Glanville wrote:
>         > +1 for Markdown.
>         >
>         > In terms of making Xen more accessible I think it might be a
>         good idea
>         > to update/cleanup the distro support page.
>         > 
http://wiki.xen.org/xenwiki/DistributionSupport
>         >
>         > I can probably do this.
>
>
>         Excellent, it looks like it needs it...
>
>         > Making it simple for people to get started with Xen on a
>         distro they
>         > are comfortable with is a good step forward.
>
>
>         Agreed. In fact for many users this is probably the end goal,
>         not just a
>         step along the way.
>
>         > I know distro specific guides could turn into a nightmare
>         but I am
>         > open to writing one for Debian 6 Squeeze,
>
>
>         In cases such as this we should also consider updating the
>         distro's wiki
>         page. I'm not sure where the canonical guide should live
>         (
wiki.xen.org
>         or 
wiki.debian.org) but they should certainly cross reference
>         each
>         other.
>
> Yeah that's a tricky one, I guess we can start at 
wiki.xen.org and go
> from there.
> Seeing as Debian repackages Xen, 
wiki.debian.org should probably be
> the final canonical location.
>
>
>
>         >  there are also a few that exist already for RHEL/CentOS on
>         the wiki.
>         > This should get easier as more distros update to 3.0+
>         kernels that
>         > support PVops out of the box...
>         >
>         > Next would be networking documentation as network-bridge
>         script has
>         > been deprecated.
>         > 
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenNetworking
>         > Once again I think alot of the documentation is going to be
>         distro
>         > specific to be newbie friendly but atleast a simple ip/brctl
>         guide
>         > would help.
>         >
>         > IMO knowing where to start and setting up networking were
>         the biggest
>         > barriers when I was picking up Xen a few years back.
>
>
>         We now have
>         
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HostConfiguration/Networking
>         which
>         could do with being made more discoverable.
>
> That is -much- better and as you said should be much easier to find..
>
>
>         There is also
>         
http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/HostConfiguration but
>         its looking pretty sad right now...
>
> I can think of some stuff to fill that up.
> eg. Howto enable live migration, local VM storage guide possibly
>
>
>
>         >
>         > I am also open to updating the blktap2 pages and README to
>         reflect the
>         > new tap-ctl userspace utilities and tips on driver
>         development.
>         >
>         > <slightly off-topic but related>
>         >
>         > With 
jailtime.org(stacklet) now charging for subscription
>         there is
>         > nowhere to download pre-built clean Xen compatible images
>         free of
>         > charge etc.
>         > I have pvgrub/pygrub capable images of Ubuntu/Debian/CentOS
>         that I am
>         > considering hosting for free.
>         > Generally new users are confused on how to build new
>         paravirt VMs, I
>         > think prebuilt images are suboptimal but a good place to
>         start for
>         > beginners.
>
>
>         There was discussion of Debian providing such a thing on
>         debian-deval
>         back in late July, I should chase that up really.
>
>         Cheers,
>         Ian.
>
>
>         >
>         > Joseph.
>         >
>         > On 29 September 2011 00:00, Ian Campbell
>         <
Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>         > wrote:
>         >         On Wed, 2011-09-28 at 14:48 +0100, Konrad Rzeszutek
>         Wilk
>         >         wrote:
>         >         > On Wed, Sep 28, 2011 at 02:26:31PM +0100, Ian
>         Jackson wrote:
>         >         > > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Xen
>         document day
>         >         (Oct 12 or 26)"):
>         >         > > > Since the guest APIs are stable there should
>         be
>         >         relatively little churn
>         >         > > > so perhaps a wiki page (or even series of
>         pages) would
>         >         be appropriate
>         >         > > > for this sort of thing?
>         >         > >
>         >         > > I want this to be in-tree.  If it's in-tree, we
>         can refuse
>         >         patches
>         >         > > which do not update the documentation.
>         >         > >
>         >         > > > I think this would be good too and in fact
>         even more
>         >         important than the
>         >         > > > interface documentation. Everyone needs to be
>         able to
>         >         build Xen to hack
>         >         > > > on it but only a subset need to know any
>         particular API.
>         >         > > >
>         >         > > > Also although we recommend that users consume
>         Xen via
>         >         their distro where
>         >         > > > possible such a guide would also help any who
>         would
>         >         rather build from
>         >         > > > scratch (e.g. because we've asked them to "try
>         the
>         >         latest version" or to
>         >         > > > bisect a bug etc).
>         >         > >
>         >         > > This would be a good candidate for a wiki page,
>         backed up
>         >         by revisions
>         >         > > of the in-tree README.
>         >         >
>         >         >
>         >         > Any recommendations on what would be a good format
>         to write
>         >         these "interface"
>         >         > pages in?
>         >
>         >
>         >         For in-line (i.e. in xen/include/public/*.h) docs of
>         APIs I
>         >         played a
>         >         little bit with integrating kernel-doc into the Xen
>         build
>         >         system but it
>         >         is tied a little too closely to the kernel build
>         >         infrastructure.
>         >
>         >         Doxygen seems like a plausible alternative with life
>         outside
>         >         the kernel
>         >         etc. We actually appear to already have some doxygen
>         stuff for
>         >         the
>         >         pytyhon stuff (judging from the Makefile, I've not
>         actually
>         >         noticed the
>         >         structured code comments anywhere)
>         >
>         >         For non-inline docs I think we decided that markdown
>         would be
>         >         a good
>         >         answer.
>         >
>         >         Ian.
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >         _______________________________________________
>         >         Xen-devel mailing list
>         >         
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>         >         
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         >
>         > --
>         > Founder | Director | VP Research
>         >
>         > Orion Virtualisation Solutions | 
www.orionvm.com.au | Phone:
>         1300 56
>         > 99 52 | Mobile: 0428 754 846
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Founder | Director | VP Research
>
> Orion Virtualisation Solutions | 
www.orionvm.com.au | Phone: 1300 56
> 99 52 | Mobile: 0428 754 846