|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks
To: |
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks |
From: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:06:36 -0700 |
Cc: |
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx>, Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>, KVM <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@xxxxxxxxxx>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stephan Diestelhorst <stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 28 Sep 2011 12:07:57 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<CA+55aFwm7ESNfrHhEHrAKcjcPUq8YxtuEkJd5PzAekYo2dMYNw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
References: |
<cover.1315878463.git.jeremy.fitzhardinge@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E835851.7070502@xxxxxxxxx> <4E835E50.2020307@xxxxxxxx> <201109282008.17722.stephan.diestelhorst@xxxxxxx> <CA+55aFwm7ESNfrHhEHrAKcjcPUq8YxtuEkJd5PzAekYo2dMYNw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20110906 Thunderbird/6.0.2 |
On 09/28/2011 11:49 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> But I don't care all *that* deeply. I do agree that the xaddw trick is
> pretty tricky. I just happen to think that it's actually *less* tricky
> than "read the upper bits separately and depend on subtle ordering
> issues with another writer that happens at the same time on another
> CPU".
>
> So I can live with either form - as long as it works. I think it might
> be easier to argue that the xaddw is guaranteed to work, because all
> values at all points are unarguably atomic (yeah, we read the lower
> bits nonatomically, but as the owner of the lock we know that nobody
> else can write them).
Exactly. I just did a locked add variant, and while the code looks a
little simpler, it definitely has more actual complexity to analyze.
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, H. Peter Anvin
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Stephan Diestelhorst
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks, Linus Torvalds
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 00/10] [PATCH RFC V2] Paravirtualized ticketlocks,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
|
|
|
|
|