WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] arch_set_info_guest() and cr1

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] arch_set_info_guest() and cr1
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:32:37 +0100
Cc: "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:33:30 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E45DED5.40602@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Citrix Systems, Inc.
References: <20110811190315.1cc6afab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA6A83D7.1F1E6%keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> <20110812150115.6047b8c2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E45DED5.40602@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(old mail, I know)

On Sat, 2011-08-13 at 03:17 +0100, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 08/12/2011 03:01 PM, Mukesh Rathor wrote:
> > Ah I see it, during save/restore, it is used. 
> > Well, I'm trying to keep the option of using PV paging with hybrid, so 
> > I may need to honor that. But that's phase 2.
> 
> Though it would be nice to re-enable the use of PV writable pagetables
> to get access to HAP, and we could do without that.
> 
> Does Xen require that the user pagetable be a proper subset of the
> kernel pagetable?  If we can assume that and get proper ring protections
> in the HVM container, then we can simply ignore the user pagetable (and
> would have to if we want to get good syscall performance).

IIRC back when I did the (now completely defunct) supervisor mode kernel
stuff that was exactly the assumption which was made and it certainly
worked in practice (although "require" might be a strong term).

Ian.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>