WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: Virtualization Test Day for F16 and Xen

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 03:38:09PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 10:10 -0500, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
> > >> There are known bugs in FC15/FC16 that have been filled some time ago 
> > >> that
> > >> folks will sadly run into: 728775, 658387  and 668063
> > >> 
> > >> Fortunatly the bugs have patches attached and the files to be modified 
> > >> are shell scripts.
> >  
> > > Yep, links here:
> > > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728775
> > 
> > The Fedora update system reports this is fixed in grub2-1.99-6.fc16.
> > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658387
> > 
> > Peter Jones submitted a new grubby package yesterday. This seems to fix
> > bug #658387 (i.e., new-kernel-pkg creates a Dom0-style grub.cfg entry
> > if /etc/sysconfig/kernel contains "HYPERVISOR=/boot/xen.gz").
> > 
> > I have not yet tested this on Fedora 16. However, I did test on Fedora
> > 15. In this case, bug #668063 is still in effect. That is, grubby creates
> > most of a GRUB record, but the "module initramfs-..." entry is missing.
> > 
> > Has anyone yet tested this new grubby package on Fedora 16 yet? Does
> > using GRUB 2 makes #668063 irrelevant?

I believe so (the irrelevant part). But the functionality part of grubby picking
up /etc/sysconfig/kernel and making that kernel the default is not in Grub2 - so
not sure how that can be addressed.
> > 
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=668063
> > 
> > I just added some more description to this bug.
> 
> So, there's a meta-point here: we currently 'require' Beta releases to
> boot as guests on Xen hosts:
> 
> "The release must boot successfully as a virtual guest in a situation
> where the virtual host is running a supported Xen implementation"
> 
> I really don't have much knowledge of Xen and haven't followed this
> discussion closely, but do any currently-known bugs prevent this? If so,
> please flag them up so they can be considered as Beta blockers...thanks!

Somehow the xen-kbdfront driver is not included in the initrd image
(I think) - and we end with anaconda but can't type anything.  I've been trying
to figure out how to inject said module in the install initrd to see if that is
really the problem but running in roadblocks (like xz 5.1.1alpha or 5.0.3 
complains
about corrupt image, or I've no idea how to make driver disks).

Any ideas?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel