|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/i386: follow-up to "replace order-based range ch
The numbers obtained from the hypervisor really can't ever lead to an
overflow here, only the original calculation going through the order
of the range could have. This avoids the (as Jeremy points outs)
somewhat ugly NULL-based calculation here.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/xen/mmu.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- 3.1-rc6/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
+++ 3.1-rc6-i386-xen-p2m-nr/arch/x86/xen/mmu.c
@@ -1721,10 +1721,8 @@ void __init xen_setup_machphys_mapping(v
machine_to_phys_nr = MACH2PHYS_NR_ENTRIES;
}
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
- if ((machine_to_phys_mapping + machine_to_phys_nr)
- < machine_to_phys_mapping)
- machine_to_phys_nr = (unsigned long *)NULL
- - machine_to_phys_mapping;
+ WARN_ON((machine_to_phys_mapping + (machine_to_phys_nr - 1))
+ < machine_to_phys_mapping);
#endif
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/i386: follow-up to "replace order-based range checking of M2P table by linear one",
Jan Beulich <=
|
|
|
|
|