WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xen: Clear IRQ_GUEST bit from irq_desc status if its act

To: "Igor Mammedov" <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xen: Clear IRQ_GUEST bit from irq_desc status if its action is NULL
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:10:57 +0100
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 06:12:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4E6F4E53.3010100@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <1315904920-12533-1-git-send-email-imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> <4E6F5E830200007800055D49@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4E6F4E53.3010100@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 13.09.11 at 14:36, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 09/13/2011 01:45 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 13.09.11 at 11:08, Igor Mammedov<imammedo@xxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:
>>> On a system with Intel C600 series Patsburg SAS controller
>>> if following command are executed:
>>>
>>>    rmmod isci
>>>    modprobe isci
>>>
>>> the host will crash in pirq_guest_bind in attempt to dereference
>>> NULL action pointer.
>>>
>>> This is caused by isci driver which does not cleanup irq properly,
>>> removing device first and then os tries to unbind its irqs afterwards.
>>>
>>> c/s 20093 and 20844 fixed host crashes when removing isci module.
>>>
>>> However in dynamic_irq_cleanup 'action' field of irq_desc is set to
>>> NULL but IRQ_GUEST flag in 'status' field is not cleared. So on next
>>
>> So why don't you clear the bit there?
> 
> then we may hit
> 
> BUG_ON(!(desc->status & IRQ_GUEST));
> 
> in pirq_guest_unbind -> __pirq_guest_unbind
> 
> It seams safer for me to clear bit in __pirq_guest_unbind

Makes sense - could you say so in the description when re-submitting?

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel