xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:42:12PM +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> xl is supposed to superseed xm, is this correct? How mature is xl,
> actually? I'm asking, because the maintainers of the gentoo's xen
> packages are migrating the init.d-scripts from xm to xl, but xl is
> causing a lot of trouble.
>
> Well, xl basically fails to start domains on my system.
> > # xl create /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > Parsing config file /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is
> > below the minimum threshold
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is
> > below the minimum threshold
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is
> > below the minimum threshold
> > failed to free memory for the domain
>
> Consider, that autobaloon=1 in xl.conf.
> With the autobaloon=0 the errors change to
>
> > # xl create /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > Parsing config file /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > libxl: error: libxl_device.c:476:libxl__wait_for_device_model Device Model
> > not ready
> > xl: fatal error: libxl_create.c:535, rc=-1:
> > libxl__confirm_device_model_startup
>
>
> Note, that I use dom0_mem=512M in grub.conf. Also, xm top states, that
> there are 2139432k free memory. Considering the first issue, it seems
> like xl is trying to baloon memory away from dom0, which fails - which
> seems obvious wrong considering that I use dom0_mem. CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
> is enabled for dom0
Yeah, there is a bug there (in Linux kernel) that just got integrated in
3.1-rc5.
Will show up in 3.0.5.
Hm, but the migrating memory away from dom0 seems bizzare. Lets ping
David who has been in the thick of this. I have a feeling it is the
"delta" patches ..
>
> The second issue sounds more severe, and I'm pretty clueless.
>
> Is this a bug in xl?
> Starting the very same domain with xm works without a hassle.
>
>
> dom0:
> vanilla 3.0.0 with vga patch
You could upgrade to 3.0.4 and then you get the VGA patch for free
(and some bug-fixes too).
> xen 4.1.1
>
> domU config:
> kernel = "/usr/src/linux-domU/_domU/vmlinux"
> memory = 2048
> vcpus = 8
>
> root = "/dev/xvda1"
> extra = "ro"
>
> disk = [
> "phy:/dev/md2,xvda1,w",
> "phy:/dev/md5,xvda2,w",
> ]
> vif = [
> "bridge=xenbr0,mac=00:16:3E:00:00:01",
> "bridge=xenbr1,mac=00:16:3E:00:01:01",
> ]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, David Vrabel
- [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Sven Köhler
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Stefano Stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl, Ian Campbell
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl (fwd) [and 1 more messages], Ian Jackson
|
|
|