WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl

To: Sven Köhler <sven.koehler@xxxxxxxxx>, david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] xl vs. xm, possible bug in xl
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:07:55 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:10:06 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <j4ar95$8fi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <j4ar95$8fi$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 06:42:12PM +0200, Sven Köhler wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> xl is supposed to superseed xm, is this correct? How mature is xl,
> actually? I'm asking, because the maintainers of the gentoo's xen
> packages are migrating the init.d-scripts from xm to xl, but xl is
> causing a lot of trouble.
> 
> Well, xl basically fails to start domains on my system.
> > # xl create /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > Parsing config file /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is 
> > below the minimum threshold
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is 
> > below the minimum threshold
> > libxl: error: libxl.c:2145:libxl_set_memory_target new target 0 for dom0 is 
> > below the minimum threshold
> > failed to free memory for the domain
> 
> Consider, that autobaloon=1 in xl.conf.
> With the autobaloon=0 the errors change to
> 
> > # xl create /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > Parsing config file /etc/xen/xen-sk1
> > libxl: error: libxl_device.c:476:libxl__wait_for_device_model Device Model 
> > not ready
> > xl: fatal error: libxl_create.c:535, rc=-1: 
> > libxl__confirm_device_model_startup
> 
> 
> Note, that I use dom0_mem=512M in grub.conf. Also, xm top states, that
> there are 2139432k free memory. Considering the first issue, it seems
> like xl is trying to baloon memory away from dom0, which fails - which
> seems obvious wrong considering that I use dom0_mem. CONFIG_XEN_BALLOON
> is enabled for dom0

Yeah, there is a bug there (in Linux kernel) that just got integrated in 
3.1-rc5.
Will show up in 3.0.5.

Hm, but the migrating memory away from dom0 seems bizzare. Lets ping
David who has been in the thick of this. I have a feeling it is the
"delta" patches ..

> 
> The second issue sounds more severe, and I'm pretty clueless.
> 
> Is this a bug in xl?

> Starting the very same domain with xm works without a hassle.
> 
> 
> dom0:
> vanilla 3.0.0 with vga patch

You could upgrade to 3.0.4 and then you get the VGA patch for free
(and some bug-fixes too).

> xen 4.1.1
> 
> domU config:
> kernel = "/usr/src/linux-domU/_domU/vmlinux"
> memory = 2048
> vcpus = 8
> 
> root = "/dev/xvda1"
> extra = "ro"
> 
> disk = [
>       "phy:/dev/md2,xvda1,w",
>       "phy:/dev/md5,xvda2,w",
> ]
> vif = [
>       "bridge=xenbr0,mac=00:16:3E:00:00:01",
>       "bridge=xenbr1,mac=00:16:3E:00:01:01",
> ]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel