| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Linux Stubdom Problem
|
To: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Linux Stubdom Problem |
|
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2011 14:11:45 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jiageng Yu <yujiageng734@xxxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxx>, Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Fri, 02 Sep 2011 06:12:39 -0700 |
|
Dkim-signature: |
v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :thread-index:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a60JQ07sQ20W5ZLkbfjs0BpjBdGI4VyUMJeihAcJLMA=; b=U6aswHZne3ZYKKDTikjKpXgQtiTIiC1VgA2GKpvNyFHJ5h4M7m8cLNUEwq6xp+rOAT 58PNa03lEey7j7ah4846zapetm2uVPS+6i1gmT8rimCbLmLL0Pg33u/hcIUS6FGgYJBl cEYZN2xjN0oY8/aP0FwGZ3WW/Zcv+Z21ElVFU= |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1109021401000.12963@kaball-desktop> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
Thread-index: |
Acxpcd0v1E2dk76LSkeV6O+GrFHaNQ== |
|
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] Re: Linux Stubdom Problem |
|
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.30.0.110427 |
On 02/09/2011 14:09, "Stefano Stabellini" <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>> Why? HVMloader is already tightly coupled to the hypervisor and the
>> toostack - special cases for stubdoms should be fine.
>
> I think think that leaking the implementation details of the device
> model into hvmloader should be avoided, but obviously if there are no
> alternatives, it can be done.
This is a fair and more general point, that we don't want fragile
dependencies on qemu now that we are using upstream. But as I say that's a
more general point on our policy regarding qemu, rather than something
specifically concerning hvmloader.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home